BeaverDriver Posted August 14, 2015 Share Posted August 14, 2015 Good Morning, A tree trimming service is required at the west end of the runway at Seldovia (PASO), Alaska (SAK fat region, not default) when possible please. I got rid of the birds in it yesterday on my landing, but the tree still remains. This single tree is immediately adjacent to the runway and in the flight path. Assistance would be appreciated. Many thanks Glenn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dominique Posted August 14, 2015 Share Posted August 14, 2015 Hi Glenn No tree on the left (western) edge of RW 34 on my rig, at beautiful Seldovia, with the vegetation autogen slider set at very dense in P3D. Actually the runway is pretty free of tree all around except of a lone conifer in the trajectory, but just after crossing the well named Airport avenue, when landing into 34 and a small cluster a little further but off the trajectory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Voyager Posted August 14, 2015 Share Posted August 14, 2015 I was curious, and with FSX, actually found that there's this lone tree on the left. Anything that harms the landing in such a nice place. Fine indeed! My autogen is set to dense. Cheers, Voyager Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dominique Posted August 14, 2015 Share Posted August 14, 2015 As I'm not sure that there will be a SP soon, what you could do is to use the Airport Design Editor and apply a smal autogen exclude patch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wulfbindewald Posted August 14, 2015 Share Posted August 14, 2015 A quick Google check in front of Rwy34 shows a lot of obviously cut "half-size" trees, please see here https://www.google.de/maps/place/Seldovia,+Alaska+99663,+USA/@59.44279,-151.7098399,3a,75y,189h,90t/data=!3m8!1e2!3m6!1s-kZpUs_PEHXs%2FTuYnkXT8deI%2FAAAAAAAAZbc%2FvhH9I2J7vZ4!2e4!3e12!6s%2F%2Flh4.googleusercontent.com%2F-kZpUs_PEHXs%2FTuYnkXT8deI%2FAAAAAAAAZbc%2FvhH9I2J7vZ4%2Fs203-k-no%2F!7i3008!8i2000!4m2!3m1!1s0x56c1237381169a6b:0x2ed6ec3b81c85579!6m1!1e1 https://www.google.de/maps/place/Seldovia,+Alaska+99663,+USA/@59.4406,-151.7109,3a,75y,187h,90t/data=!3m8!1e2!3m6!1s--ouFJyp1zd8%2FTuYnu8RoRkI%2FAAAAAAAAZbs%2FDET4NpFOlUU!2e4!3e12!6s%2F%2Flh5.googleusercontent.com%2F--ouFJyp1zd8%2FTuYnu8RoRkI%2FAAAAAAAAZbs%2FDET4NpFOlUU%2Fs203-k-no%2F!7i3008!8i2000!4m2!3m1!1s0x56c1237381169a6b:0x2ed6ec3b81c85579!6m1!1e1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TigerTigerM Posted August 14, 2015 Share Posted August 14, 2015 A quick Google check in front of Rwy34 shows a lot of obviously cut "half-size" trees, please see here https://www.google.de/maps/place/Seldovia,+Alaska+99663,+USA/@59.44279,-151.7098399,3a,75y,189h,90t/data=!3m8!1e2!3m6!1s-kZpUs_PEHXs%2FTuYnkXT8deI%2FAAAAAAAAZbc%2FvhH9I2J7vZ4!2e4!3e12!6s%2F%2Flh4.googleusercontent.com%2F-kZpUs_PEHXs%2FTuYnkXT8deI%2FAAAAAAAAZbc%2FvhH9I2J7vZ4%2Fs203-k-no%2F!7i3008!8i2000!4m2!3m1!1s0x56c1237381169a6b:0x2ed6ec3b81c85579!6m1!1e1 https://www.google.de/maps/place/Seldovia,+Alaska+99663,+USA/@59.4406,-151.7109,3a,75y,187h,90t/data=!3m8!1e2!3m6!1s--ouFJyp1zd8%2FTuYnu8RoRkI%2FAAAAAAAAZbs%2FDET4NpFOlUU!2e4!3e12!6s%2F%2Flh5.googleusercontent.com%2F--ouFJyp1zd8%2FTuYnu8RoRkI%2FAAAAAAAAZbs%2FDET4NpFOlUU%2Fs203-k-no%2F!7i3008!8i2000!4m2!3m1!1s0x56c1237381169a6b:0x2ed6ec3b81c85579!6m1!1e1 looks like they have been topped & are regrowing. TTM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Voyager Posted August 14, 2015 Share Posted August 14, 2015 More an overview of the Rwy 34 final approach area. Your GE shot: Mine in FSX: Without disregarding your vision, it seems very close to Google Earth captures ... Logically Trees HD manuring is a bit in these trees. LoL A possible correction of the height of the trees, you'll get here at this link: http://www.orbxsystems.com/forum/topic/98254-trees-blocking-approach-to-eglk/?hl=%2Btrees+%2Bon+%2Bapproach Cheers, Voyager Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeaverDriver Posted August 14, 2015 Author Share Posted August 14, 2015 Sorry, should have said FSX. Not a clue what P3D has in it. I guess I should have put a screenie in, but it's at the left centre of RWY 16, just prior to the threshold (not actually on the runway itself). It is impossible to miss it in anything much larger than a Super Cub if you want to get stopped before the far end. The runway is 1800 ft so lot a lot of excess room for aircraft like the 206 and up. My autogen is set to Normal. Thanks More an overview of the Rwy 34 final approach area. Your GE shot: My in FSX: Without disregarding your vision, it seems very close to Google Earth captures ... Logically Trees HD manuring is a bit in these trees. LoL A possible correction of the height of the trees, you'll get here at this link: http://www.orbxsystems.com/forum/topic/98254-trees-blocking-approach-to-eglk/?hl=%2Btrees+%2Bon+%2Bapproach Cheers, Voyager As I said, it's at the west end of the airport for RWY 16. This is the east end of the airport . I don't see any problems at all with that approach. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dominique Posted August 14, 2015 Share Posted August 14, 2015 We looked into the 34 trajectory as final approach to 16 is over water. and you didn't specify . No tree at 16 either. That's maybe a FSX thing knowing however that P3D and FSX share the same texture set and that tree density is higher in P3D. So the question is, had you switched FTX Central to North America when you flew into PASO or were you inadvertently with an other set of textures like Global ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeaverDriver Posted August 14, 2015 Author Share Posted August 14, 2015 Yeah, I think I need someone with FSX to look at this. P3D could be altogether different in its portrayal and how it calls autogen. With respect, if you are looking at the trajectory for RWY 34 as the approach to 16, then you're 180 degrees off. Yes, most of the approach is over water to 16 (and I did say the WEST end of the airport, not the east), but there is some land where the runway starts, and that is where the tree is. Please see the screenshot below: Even the Super Cub's wing drags through that if you don't go over the top of it. This is SAK so it matters little what Global and Vector are doing, and I have my settings at Global/Hybrid (which will only matter outside the fat regions to the best of my knowledge based on reading the manuals). Anyway, I can simply write an exclude file for it and save everyone a lot of hassle I guess. I just thought it might help others if I reported it here and it was fixed in a later update. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Voyager Posted August 14, 2015 Share Posted August 14, 2015 Hi BeaverDriver, Okay, now I understand, but see that in my first post (post # 3), second shot, I already wrote down that there was only one solitary tree on the left. Actually I'm not this your new tree, so I said did not interfere with the landing, see there, in post # 3. So if anyone here confirms this your extra tree can be something with your configuration (or mine isn't right! LoL). Cheers, Voyager Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holger Sandmann Posted August 14, 2015 Share Posted August 14, 2015 Hi Glenn, I just looked at the airport and I only have that single small tree off to the east side of RW34, the same as in Voyager's screenshot. I've tried all different slider combinations for autogen and terrain but in no case did any additional trees show up. Are you using SAK updated to Service Pack 4? https://www.fullterrain.com/product/sak Cheers, Holger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeaverDriver Posted August 15, 2015 Author Share Posted August 15, 2015 Thanks Holger, yes, SAK has Patches 003 & 004 installed. I'm running with FTX Central set to Global/Hybrid and autogen at Norm. Anyway, not sure why I'm seeing this, but I did build an exclude rectangle as one poster suggested and it's gone now. Odd that I'm getting it when others running FSX aren't, but them's the breaks I guess. Not a problem now anyway. Appreciate the help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stewart Hobson Posted August 15, 2015 Share Posted August 15, 2015 Glenn, Shouldn't your FTX Central be set to North America? You're in Alaska/North America. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeaverDriver Posted August 15, 2015 Author Share Posted August 15, 2015 Well, I often fly north and east out of the fat region, so I keep it at Hybrid for that. To be honest, I've not seen any significant differences between having that and Global/Hybrid checked, which (if I'm not mistaken) was the reason for having that option. I'll have a look today though and see if that changes anything on that approach. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stewart Hobson Posted August 15, 2015 Share Posted August 15, 2015 Well, I often fly north and east out of the fat region, so I keep it at Hybrid for that. To be honest, I've not seen any significant differences between having that and Global/Hybrid checked, which (if I'm not mistaken) was the reason for having that option. I'll have a look today though and see if that changes anything on that approach. For what it's worth, I keep NA checked for all my flying in North America, whether I'm flying into or out of a full region or not. The Hybrid option hasn't made any difference in that respect for me either. Stew Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeaverDriver Posted August 15, 2015 Author Share Posted August 15, 2015 Well Stew, you hit the nail on the head. I switched to North America and turned off the Exclusion file I made and sure enough, the tree is gone (see below): The right arrow points to where the tree is when Global/Hybrid is checked/active but is now gone with North America active. The left arrow points to the tree that remains regardless but is no problem on approach (if it is, you have bigger problems than a tree <LOL>). Many thanks for this. I'll try flying in and out of the region with just NA enabled and see if I get little or no change from having Global/Hybrid checked as you do, although I think I will hit the manuals again just to be on the safe side as I do often stray out of the "fat" regions. Thanks again Stew and others who responded. Much appreciated Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stewart Hobson Posted August 15, 2015 Share Posted August 15, 2015 Well Stew, you hit the nail on the head. I switched to North America and turned off the Exclusion file I made and sure enough, the tree is gone (see below): The right arrow points to where the tree is when Global/Hybrid is checked/active but is now gone with North America active. The left arrow points to the tree that remains regardless but is no problem on approach (if it is, you have bigger problems than a tree <LOL>). Many thanks for this. I'll try flying in and out of the region with just NA enabled and see if I get little or no change from having Global/Hybrid checked as you do, although I think I will hit the manuals again just to be on the safe side as I do often stray out of the "fat" regions. Thanks again Stew and others who responded. Much appreciated You're quite welcome! I've been doing quite a bit of flying in the US Midwest recently--Colorado, Kansas, Missouri, etc., all with NA enabled. No problems. However, I don't think you can get away with sticking with one Region enabled, if, say, you were flying out of Europe into Africa. In that case checking Global/Hybrid is advised, as far as I know. I don't own the Europe Region, so don't know for sure. I seem to remember Holger saying that keeping NA checked when flying in North America in general will result in no significant problems or visual glitches. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeaverDriver Posted August 15, 2015 Author Share Posted August 15, 2015 Ok, that's very helpful - thanks. I do have Europe and Norway, but I'm not flying there at the moment. It's all in Alaska and the Yukon, so sounds like I'll be good to go as is. Much appreciated Stew. One mystery cleared Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neptune6 Posted August 15, 2015 Share Posted August 15, 2015 I'm on north AM switch FTX CENTRAL2 and the tree is here at the same place But there no problem for any landing with an appropriate plane on this gravel runway . Patrick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Double J Posted August 16, 2015 Share Posted August 16, 2015 I flew there today. If you have hybrid mode on that big tree is there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stewart Hobson Posted August 16, 2015 Share Posted August 16, 2015 I flew there today. If you have hybrid mode on that big tree is there. Yes, sir. We finally figured that out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeaverDriver Posted August 16, 2015 Author Share Posted August 16, 2015 As Stew said. The smaller tree to the north of the big one (further off the side of the runway) isn't a problem as it's too far away to catch a wing on. The big tree that appears when you are running Global/Hybrid is a problem though, so switching to North America OR building a small exclude rectangle is necessary to eliminate it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TigerTigerM Posted August 16, 2015 Share Posted August 16, 2015 Yes, sir. We finally figured that out. Stewart If you fly in there in NA, then go in again in Global Hybrid [with the offending tree appearing] - do you notice any differences in quality of the scenery between the two settings? [Detail, sharpness, misplaced roads etc??] TTM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stewart Hobson Posted August 16, 2015 Share Posted August 16, 2015 Stewart If you fly in there in NA, then go in again in Global Hybrid [with the offending tree appearing] - do you notice any differences in quality of the scenery between the two settings? [Detail, sharpness, misplaced roads etc??] TTM I'll have to try it out this afternoon. I don't think I've ever flown there, but will try to see the differences, if any, besides the tree of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TigerTigerM Posted August 16, 2015 Share Posted August 16, 2015 I'll have to try it out this afternoon. I don't think I've ever flown there, but will try to see the differences, if any, besides the tree of course. Thanks Eyesight not 20:20 & can miss some detail. TTM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stewart Hobson Posted August 16, 2015 Share Posted August 16, 2015 Went to PASO and scouted around. With NA selected, there was only one tree. With Global/Hybrid, there were 2 trees. However, the second large one, nearest the runway threshold, was nowhere near as close to the runway as Glenn's original picture shows. So...? No other detailed differences were noticeable. But the only way to tell would be to fly some circuits around the place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.