SamuelFita Posted December 19, 2017 Share Posted December 19, 2017 Hi, I am facing a very difficult problem with San Diego Addon. I tried different settings and the texture improved just a little bit better. My problem is that after I leave the San Diego and fly to South of it in dirrection to Tijuana the scenery looks very bad..it looks like in cartoon networks! The texture looks teribile. I think I have a good computer. I have Win 10, 64bit. My computer has an I7 6900K and Gigabyte X99 Ultra Gaming motherboard. I have 128 GB of Ram at 3466mhz, I have 2 graphic cards in Sli way Gigabyte Aorus Gtx 1080ti waterforce extreme edition 11GB, power supply Corsair modular 1475W and I have 2 Samsung Evo SSD at 2TB each of them and another SSD Samsung Pro at 1 TB. Totally 5TB. Let me tell you what I have installed by now. I installed Ftx Global and Vector, Europe, North America, South America, Orbx Mash for South America, Australia, New Zealand, Norway, Ireland, N. Ireland, Scotland, Southern Alaska, Pacific Northwest, Pacific Fjords, The Rockies (Northern and Central) all Ftx Australian airports and all Ftx North American Airports and airfields, Ftx Germany, many from ftx Global and European airports and airfields, Southern and Northern California. My only problem is just San Diego. I followed the orbx instructions in making the settings for San Diego but the texture looks still bad. Maybe you can help me, please. Thank you. Sam from Romania. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doug Sawatzky Posted December 19, 2017 Share Posted December 19, 2017 Hi Sam Could you please post some screenshots? Cheers Doug Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SamuelFita Posted December 19, 2017 Author Share Posted December 19, 2017 Hi Doug, Thank you for answer. I will post some screenshots. I can't do it now because we have too late here. But I will surely post a few in the morning. Sam Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SamuelFita Posted December 20, 2017 Author Share Posted December 20, 2017 Here is a screenshot... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matteo Veneziani Posted December 20, 2017 Share Posted December 20, 2017 Hi, for texture are you referring to the photoreal right? You have to try to set higher photoreal resolution in the option. You can expect a super sharp photoreal resolution, because the photoreal used for sourrounding is very big and is about 0.70cm/px. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SamuelFita Posted December 20, 2017 Author Share Posted December 20, 2017 Hi, Thank you for answer. The only set that I made regarding resolution was to set in my simulator settings the resulotion at 3840X1600 (this is my monitor resolution). Is there another resolution settings I need to make? I haven't made in fsx cfg any change.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matteo Veneziani Posted December 20, 2017 Share Posted December 20, 2017 No monitor resolution, i mean ground resolution inside p3d option. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SamuelFita Posted December 20, 2017 Author Share Posted December 20, 2017 Sorry...I run FSX... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SamuelFita Posted December 22, 2017 Author Share Posted December 22, 2017 It seems that there is no solution for fixing my problem with San Diego. I spent the my money for it and can't use it.. Orbx says that id there are problems with any of the products to post it only on forum.. I had one more problem before with some huge errors in Southern California and I was not helped as for San Diego now, too. Spent over a thousand Euro buying almost al the products and when having a problem...no support! Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matteo Veneziani Posted December 22, 2017 Share Posted December 22, 2017 Hi, I'm trying to help you with your problem, in the post above. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SamuelFita Posted December 22, 2017 Author Share Posted December 22, 2017 OK. Thank you. I have FSX. Is there a change I need to make in fsx.cfg? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick Cooper Posted December 22, 2017 Share Posted December 22, 2017 Perhaps pictures will help. Do this and you will see this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SamuelFita Posted December 22, 2017 Author Share Posted December 22, 2017 Thank You very much, sir! I tried your settings but I have had improvements only in San Diego City. Going to South it still looks badly. Just see the two pictures bellow.. I am aslo sending all my settings in my fsx. My computer runs 128 GB of Ram at 3466mhz and 2 grapgic cards gtx 1080ti waterforce extreme edition 11GB and and I7 6900K and 3 Samsung SSD Evo and Pro at 5TB.. This is the only addon that makes me problems, San Diego.. Just see the pictures bellow... Thank You. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick Cooper Posted December 22, 2017 Share Posted December 22, 2017 You need to be sure that you are looking at the "San Diego addon" and not the default San Diego. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SamuelFita Posted December 22, 2017 Author Share Posted December 22, 2017 San Diego looks fantastic! It is very nice for me. I am very happy with it. But the sarrounding, the metropolitan area looks terrible. When flying to South, to Tijuana, it looks as I have just shown before. I have installed all mega scenery earth USA except just 3 or 4 states, and I have installed into my fsx 4.5Tb of addons and everything goes well except what metropolitan area of San Diego.. But the city looks very well and beautiful. I have wished the same for all the way to the border.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matteo Veneziani Posted December 22, 2017 Share Posted December 22, 2017 Hi, the photoreal of the city is better quality than sourrounding, you have to understand the photoreal of the sourrounding covers an huge area about ( 60km x 40km) and the quality has been reduced to about 0,7cm-1mt/px for the sourrounding photoreal. . So you can not expect to see every single details on the sourrounding photoreal . Anyway in fsx the photoreal quality could be lower than p3d ( with the same setting ) i see you have already maxed out all in fsx, so this is the best quality you can get. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SamuelFita Posted December 22, 2017 Author Share Posted December 22, 2017 Hi, I understand. I bought last week a license from Prepar3d. The license called Academic version 4.1. It runs much better than my fsx. But finally I decided to return the license back because so many of my addons were not compatible.. I spent about 6000 Euro buying all almost all addons from anywhere so I must go on with fsx...the old fsx. As far as Ftx, you guys, you are number One, I tell you! Nobody works as you do. Nice work! Therefore I got almost everything from Ftx.. Ciao. Sam from Romania Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matteo Veneziani Posted December 22, 2017 Share Posted December 22, 2017 1 hour ago, SamuelFita said: Hi, I understand. I bought last week a license from Prepar3d. The license called Academic version 4.1. It runs much better than my fsx. But finally I decided to return the license back because so many of my addons were not compatible.. I spent about 6000 Euro buying all almost all addons from anywhere so I must go on with fsx...the old fsx. As far as Ftx, you guys, you are number One, I tell you! Nobody works as you do. Nice work! Therefore I got almost everything from Ftx.. Ciao. Sam from Romania Thanks, sam. Will be an update for ksan soon, see in the preview Cheers, Matteo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SamuelFita Posted December 22, 2017 Author Share Posted December 22, 2017 Great! Thank you for information. Can't wait for it... Just one question I have.. Have you thought of making Los Angeles city and metropolitan area? Or maybe San Francisco.. I have the US Cities from Aerosoft but I am not very happy with it.. Sam Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matteo Veneziani Posted December 22, 2017 Share Posted December 22, 2017 4 minutes ago, SamuelFita said: Great! Thank you for information. Can't wait for it... Just one question I have.. Have you thought of making Los Angeles city and metropolitan area? Or maybe San Francisco.. I have the US Cities from Aerosoft but I am not very happy with it.. Sam yes, would be amazing, maybe in the future Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SamuelFita Posted December 22, 2017 Author Share Posted December 22, 2017 Yeah, maybe near future... I would pay any price for it... Just recently I talked to a producer to make my capital, Bucharest city and told him that I pay 100 Euro if he makes it...and he will make it in summer.. Ciao Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SamuelFita Posted December 23, 2017 Author Share Posted December 23, 2017 Hi Matteo, You were telling me about the San Diego update and to see it in the preview. Where to look for it? Sam Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matteo Veneziani Posted December 23, 2017 Share Posted December 23, 2017 1 hour ago, SamuelFita said: Hi Matteo, You were telling me about the San Diego update and to see it in the preview. Where to look for it? Sam Hi, here: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SamuelFita Posted December 23, 2017 Author Share Posted December 23, 2017 Thank you Matteo. Nice work! When it will come up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matteo Veneziani Posted December 23, 2017 Share Posted December 23, 2017 28 minutes ago, SamuelFita said: Thank you Matteo. Nice work! When it will come up? thanks, probably within 1 month. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SamuelFita Posted December 23, 2017 Author Share Posted December 23, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Electrixz Posted January 5, 2018 Share Posted January 5, 2018 On 12/20/2017 at 11:10 AM, Matteo Veneziani said: Hi, for texture are you referring to the photoreal right? You have to try to set higher photoreal resolution in the option. You can expect a super sharp photoreal resolution, because the photoreal used for sourrounding is very big and is about 0.70cm/px. Hi, I own this scenery for P3Dv4.1 and am encountering the same issues as the user who created this thread. I was wondering what settings do you recommend for the best visuals and minimal blurriness. Any help is appreciated! Thanks, Rey Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matteo Veneziani Posted January 6, 2018 Share Posted January 6, 2018 10 hours ago, Electrixz said: Hi, I own this scenery for P3Dv4.1 and am encountering the same issues as the user who created this thread. I was wondering what settings do you recommend for the best visuals and minimal blurriness. Any help is appreciated! Thanks, Rey Hi, you have to set inside P3D option, the best resolution of ground textures under the voice " Texture resolution ", put the slider to the max. Anyway, the sourrounding photoreal max resolution is about 1mt/px so you can't expect to see the same resolution of the photoreal near the airport. Regards, Matteo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SamuelFita Posted January 6, 2018 Author Share Posted January 6, 2018 Hello Matteo, Happy New Year ! I gave up to FSX...and I have P3D V4.1 now. Can you tell me how to set everything in this platform? Best Regards, Sam Ps. It's such a huge difference between FSX and Prepar3d v4....! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Electrixz Posted January 6, 2018 Share Posted January 6, 2018 4 hours ago, Matteo Veneziani said: Hi, you have to set inside P3D option, the best resolution of ground textures under the voice " Texture resolution ", put the slider to the max. Anyway, the sourrounding photoreal max resolution is about 1mt/px so you can't expect to see the same resolution of the photoreal near the airport. Regards, Matteo Thanks Matteo! - Rey Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Electrixz Posted January 6, 2018 Share Posted January 6, 2018 4 hours ago, SamuelFita said: Hello Matteo, Happy New Year ! I gave up to FSX...and I have P3D V4.1 now. Can you tell me how to set everything in this platform? Best Regards, Sam Ps. It's such a huge difference between FSX and Prepar3d v4....! I think there is a manual pdf that has recommended settings for orbx products? - Rey Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SamuelFita Posted January 6, 2018 Author Share Posted January 6, 2018 I don't know of any mannual pdf...for p3d v4.1 settings... It's just for FSX.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.