Jump to content

bvdboomen

Members
  • Posts

    2,664
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Posts posted by bvdboomen

  1.   

    5 hours ago, demio said:

    but that one can't use V4 add-ons in V5 is plainly not true

     

    There are always some tiny errors when moving scenery from v4 to v5.

    I've got texture popping, gras popping, elevated static and user planes, mesh errors, double/old runway textures, etc.

    All of them not being addressed by the developers since they've moved on to another sim, product or simply left.

    • Like 2
    • Sad 1
  2. How good the airports are/were in FSX/P3D, MSFS has a higher standard regarding textures, polygons and detail. So a simple port-over can eventually turn in a disappointment because of the contrast between the overall look of the sims. I would like to see them too in MSFS but then built from the ground up to meet the today's standard of MSFS.

    • Like 1
  3. Like mentioned earlier the quality of PG depends on the source data. Most PG that was shipped upon release is pretty good and is, like John says, hardly melted (Gold Coast, San Francisco, Orlando, Barcelona to name a few). Since WU Great-Britain, MS uses another source for PG (London) which is worse than the original. Michael already mentioned that Jorg made a statement about that, and I thought I saw some regrets about switching PG sources in Jorgs eyes when he said that on a Dev Q&A. :)

     

    • Like 3
×
×
  • Create New...