phmak Posted August 26, 2015 Share Posted August 26, 2015 I have installed UT Alaska, Will there be a conflict if I install the new NA LC Alaska too? Joop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holger Sandmann Posted August 26, 2015 Share Posted August 26, 2015 Hi Joop, UT Alaska uses a different approach to placing urban areas than other products in the UTX series. As mentioned in the UT Alaska manual one cannot have other landclass products active at higher display priority or their approach won't work correctly. Thus, you either need to deactivate the UT Alaska landclass entries in your scenery library menu (I believe you can also do this via the UT control panel) or deactivate the openLC NA entries while flying in Alaska. It may be possible to place the UT Alaska landclass entries at higher display priority than the Orbx openLC block but it may lead to local display issues due to mixed-up openLC and UTX textures. Perhaps other users have tested this and can provide feedback. Cheers, Holger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phmak Posted August 27, 2015 Author Share Posted August 27, 2015 Thanks Holger, I will try this out regards Joop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TedRuby Posted September 10, 2015 Share Posted September 10, 2015 Hi Joop I also use the UTX series for Alaska, Canada , and USA & Europe , the new V2 Series . Does it work with switching off the LC in UTX menu or you have scenery Errors? regards Ted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ve2dgz Posted September 10, 2015 Share Posted September 10, 2015 I use UTX AK-Canada and FTX new Open LC and FTX SAK They work excellent together (after you have tuned the products) 1. FTX Open LC AK-Canada has higher priority over UTX AK-Canada 2. FTX SAK is on top of Open LC and UTX AK-Canada 3. Some of the files in UTX need to be turned off. There is a file provided for that: Deactivation tool for UTX Alaska. Search this site. 4. Some of the airports elevation have to be disabled in UTX AK-Canada. PAHO for example. Conclusion: FTX Open LC AK-Canada with UTX AK-Canada really enhance the rest of Alaska that is not covered with FTX SAK. (the Aleutians for example). I even have Aerosoft Dutch harbour in there and it plays nicely if you de-activate its mesh. UTX AK-Canada covers the area with a good mesh. Hope this helps, Pierre Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stewart Hobson Posted September 10, 2015 Share Posted September 10, 2015 Just to note: I have FTX Open LC AK-Canada, but not UTX AK-Canada, and the Aleutians look stunning anyway, even without the UTX package. Stew Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ve2dgz Posted September 10, 2015 Share Posted September 10, 2015 I don't want to start a "debate", but UTX KA_Canada will get you better coastlines & cities/settlements. But I agree even with just Open LC, the Aleutians look way better. The desert textures are gone. Pierre Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TedRuby Posted October 9, 2015 Share Posted October 9, 2015 Hello Pierre thx for the hint I will try the configuration. regards Ted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.