Jump to content

Three comparison shots FSX default vs FTX Global


NoLonger

Recommended Posts

I've seen various comparison shots but so far only FTXG vs GEX. I don't own GEX so I am only interested in FTXG vs FSX default shots and made three myself. The FSX default shots were taken yesterday, after which I saved the flight, and today I took the FTXG shots. (These are all the comparison shots I will be able to make because I didn't back up the default textures ;) ).


 


First conclusion: WOW! Awesome! There are a few things that really stick out:


 


- better colors (FSX colors are duller)


- far less messy looking towns (FSX town look like a total random mess)


- autogen fits in textures much better (FSX autogen buildings stick out and look randomly placed)


- autogen buildings better sized (FSX buildings look too big)


- great looking and varied trees with more depth, and more too (FSX trees are less varied and completely flat)


- more depth/contrast overall (FSX looks more flat and dull)


 


I am very happy with the last shot which is from the Netherlands: I didn't expect this yet with FTXG (I though I need OpenLC for that) but even the default textures now show realistic Dutch fields!!! No more southern France like random little fields, but larger rectangle ones! Awesome! Where FSX looks looks like a complete mess and NOTHING like the Netherlands, FTXG makes it look like it should! Great!!!


 


First: Norway, using freeware Norway landclass and mesh:


 


9376996522_0174b6caa1_o.jpg


 


9376996248_eae1dface4_o.jpg


 


Norway once more:


 


9374214391_96412e6a69_o.jpg


 


9374214195_c4fd74b205_o.jpg


 


The Netherlands!


 


9374214009_9f42ae54f0_o.jpg


 


9374213777_04608d1b4f_o.jpg


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...