Rick@YMEN Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 Thanks to ARNZ and Jon Murchison for fictional RAAF repaint. Awesome looking bird and visually a pleasure to fly for those special missions.. Enjoy. [img width=1120 height=700]http://fsfiles.org/flightsimshots/images/541RAAF747_2.jpg [img width=1120 height=700]http://fsfiles.org/flightsimshots/images/445RAAF747_3.jpg [img width=1120 height=700]http://fsfiles.org/flightsimshots/images/188RAAF747_4.jpg [img width=1120 height=700]http://fsfiles.org/flightsimshots/images/659RAAF747_5.jpg [img width=1120 height=700]http://fsfiles.org/flightsimshots/images/459RAAF747_6.jpg Thanks for viewing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chumley Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 Now Julia would love this one. Royal Australian Air Force One. Has a nice ring to it especially if the 'Royal' bit is dropped. Andy b Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew Kane Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 Didn't realize the RAAF had a 747, or is that fictional. Yep - its fictional And yea I wonder when you guys and NZ will drop the 'Royal'.....Canada got rid of the RCAF back in 1968, three years after they adopted the new flag dumping the old one with the Union Jack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iain Emms Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 Very nice indeed. cheers Iain Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timmo32 Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 now your talking ricky my favourite flight and plane Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rockliffe Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 Great pics Rick! Love the low level take off shots, fab Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rosariomanzo Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 Nice shots there, even if with a bit of fantasy. (B744 needs 3300m for t/o, and 2130m for landing. Launceston is 1981m only). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
niebieski Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 (B744 needs 3300m for t/o, and 2130m for landing. Launceston is 1981m only). Not really. It all depends on takeoff/landing weight and atmospheric conditions. 747's operate regulary from runways shorther than 2000m in real life I've seen 747 getting airborne in about 1500m a couple of times and doing 1300 nm trip. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Lovell Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 Very fine shots and a nice plane!... like the shot behind the fence Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moonman Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 WOW - a very great set of screenshots - super angles, super plane - all perfectly well put together here!!!!! :o :o Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick@YMEN Posted March 3, 2011 Author Share Posted March 3, 2011 Thanks for the comments everyone. All the best for now. Rgds Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.