dominique Posted December 30, 2015 Share Posted December 30, 2015 The Mojave boneyard and Southern Cal Logistics Airport have images of large aircraft baked in the underlaying photographic airport ground. It is not that great from above and even less so in closer proximity. I quite understand that a project of that size is all about choices to optimize the fluidity but we are in the desert here, not in the LA or San Diego area. I would very much welcome to have low poly aircraft put in place in a future SP if that was possible. Don't make me wrong btw, I love SCA but this is one of the things that could improve a scenery of an excellent overall quality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fltsimguy Posted December 30, 2015 Share Posted December 30, 2015 I saw that as well and almost immediately said to myself I'll have to come back here and place a bunch of plane objects to give it some dimension. I don't have old rusted or part planes just those in the libraries but they will do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dominique Posted December 30, 2015 Author Share Posted December 30, 2015 Agreed, I will do the same without a positive answer from OrbX, the MTX should provide some low poly aircraft. But it would be nice that those without the knowledge to do so, could also benefit from it. Also the baked image of the aircraft will stay... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holger Sandmann Posted December 30, 2015 Share Posted December 30, 2015 Hi guys, the reason we included photoreal coverage for KVCV and KMHV was specifically because we didn't want to place some poorly matched low-poly models at those airports. It's a design decision on our part but I realize that people have different preferences. If you decide to place objects yourself you may want to remove the photoreal file (located in \FTX_NA_SCA06_CVX\scenery) for those airports once you're done because the white aircraft shapes will probably look rather odd underneath your 3D models. Cheers, Holger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fltsimguy Posted December 31, 2015 Share Posted December 31, 2015 Good point Holger....I think I'll try it with photoreal in place and then XXX out to see the difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireRx Posted December 31, 2015 Share Posted December 31, 2015 fltsimguy, Keep me in the loop if you are successful on the placements. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.