Jump to content

Er!k

Members
  • Posts

    312
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Er!k

  1. 2 hours ago, Marcus Nyberg said:

    I can address those issues except that I've got no clue about the ESNU ATC issue. I've reviewed the taxiway system multiple times and can't on earth understand why it refers to the terminal area as GA-parking and doesn't give you a specific terminal parking. I'll see if I got some clever collegues that might know the issue.

     

     

    @Marcus Nyberg I know the solution! For a parking you can define a 'Name' and a 'Type'. The type is i.e. 'Ramp_GA_Large or 'Gate_Small'. This needs to be adjusted at ESKS, where remote parkings need to be of type 'Ramp_GA_Large'.

     

    At ESNU the name is 'Parking'. When naming these like this MSFS ATC will always instructs 'General Aviation Parking'. If you change the name to 'Gate' so i.e. Gate 1 with type 'Ramp_GA_Large' both stairs wil come up and ATC instructs you correctly to Gate 1.

     

    See also: TaxiwayParking Objects (flightsimulator.com)

     

    Below some screenshots:

    - 1 from ESSA, where a remote parking is defined OK

    -1 from ESNU, where the remote parking is not defined OK

     

    Hope it helps!

     

    ESSA.jpg

     

    ESNU.jpg

  2. 3 minutes ago, John Burgess said:

     

    Thanks for spotting this.

    I assume this is at ESKS - that's where I'm seeing it.

     

    The perils of working on 3 airports at one time!

    Not sure but I suspect that in trying to solve a different issue with ATC at ESNU the designations at ESKS got changed.

    Then again the memory ain't what it used to be :lol:

     

    All the best,

     

    John

    Hi John, yes indeed I checked ESKS... Did not have time to check the orher airports yet...

  3. 6 minutes ago, Marcus Nyberg said:

     

    That is how it is set up. You can't add an animated jetway to a spot if it is not labeled as GATE.

     

    I think the problem being the airline labels. Right now there are airline codes for two of the normal parking I just noticed, must have put the codes on the wrong spots for some reason, I can adjust that in a patch to direct them to the gates.

     

    But just to be clear, all jetways are GATES, all other parkings are RAMP. ATC should still direct them to a specific parking, why it is not doing that I have no clue.

    Thanks for the explanation. Probably Su10 messed something up then. Anyway the airport is great! Just departed at dawn to Girona and a great take-off on 29 towards the east!

    • Like 2
  4. 8 minutes ago, Marcus Nyberg said:

     

    Nice!

    We can set airline codes for the gates, might direct the AI there instead. With my testing when they said taxi to general aviation parking they parked at the gates though. Plus there isn't any general aviation parking really, there are just none-gate parkings. The general aviation parking is the area in the east corner of the tarmac (AG01-AG08) but as it interferes with parking 09 they are not enabled in the scenery.

     

    Still a bit confused about the logics of the built in ATC and AI system.

    From what I remember you have two properties of a parking, don't know the right terms:

    - Parking name (Gate, Parking etc.)

    - Parking type (GATE SMALL, GATE MEDIUM, RAMP_GA LARGE etc.)

     

    If the name is set to GATE + number ATC says 'Taxi to gate XXX'. If this is set to parking ATC will refer to General Aviation.

  5. 7 hours ago, Richard1000 said:

    Hi

    Yes it's a great airport. Love the moving figures! Works well with the docking system. Performance could be better but there is a lot of detail..

     

    But but but!

     

    I am sorry but this is a problem with other addon airports as well. You are handed off to ground on arrival but then no offer to taxi to a gate. Don't know what you have missed out but it is very irritating!!

     

    Richard

    Yes, I noticed the same using the A320neo. Maybe parking spots are too small?

    • Like 1
  6. 1 hour ago, keino333 said:

    Wow..looking forward to all of this....Can we include and update / rework of EGLC all platforms :)  See the source image

    I hope so... But I do not think they will update EGLC. Contacted support a while ago about some issues and they stated EGLC will not be updated...

    • Sad 4
×
×
  • Create New...