Jump to content

Two is better than one...


Guest Dontay

Recommended Posts

Guest Northwest Pilot

...engines that is.

I planned on flying from Revelstoke to Chelan Muni. but I lost an engine shortly after I took off and did a 180 to the South.

Passing Revelstoke just after take off.

Posted Image

[img width=1160 height=674]http://fsfiles.org/flightsimshots/images/8712.jpg

Soon after passing CYRV I lost my starboard engine. I immediately identified the dead engine, feathered the prop, cut the throttle, and made a gentle turn toward the live engine to return to Revelstoke.

All trimmed for level flight.

[img width=1160 height=675]http://fsfiles.org/flightsimshots/images/8373.jpg

[img width=1160 height=675]http://fsfiles.org/flightsimshots/images/2184.jpg

I retracted the landing gear at the last minute to reduce the drag while on finals.

[img width=1160 height=659]http://fsfiles.org/flightsimshots/images/6205.jpg

I made it down safely however I almost lost it after cutting the engine over the threshold. It immediately yawed to the port side. Next time I'll have to cut the throttle a little slower.

[img width=1160 height=406]http://fsfiles.org/flightsimshots/images/9446.jpg

A dead engine could prove to be fatal when flying over the Northern Rockies. And that's why I say two is better than one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Northwest Pilot

Beautiful! Is it possible in FSX to randomize failures? Or you are the one to decide which is which?

Sure you can randomize. At the initial FSX screen just click on the 'Failures' tab and check out all of the options.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Northwest Pilot

Yeah Ricky it is. I'm really enjoying this twin. As a matter of fact I'm uploading a video of this same approach. I'm testing the new FS Recorder rendering feature.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...