Jump to content

Malcolm Street

Members
  • Posts

    21
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Malcolm Street

  1. 19 minutes ago, chumley said:

    IMO City Packs are a waste of time and frame rate gobblers. They are just unnecessary eye candy that hardly rate a blink of the eye to serious simmers. Orbx should spend it's time developing nice mid sized airports that are kind on resource usage but add a bit of nicety to the Sim. Until they stop pandering to the eye candy crowd they won't be getting anything out of me, sale or no sale.

    As a consumer product that's bringing in a totally new market, IMHO in MSFS "serious simmers" are well outnumbered by "the eye candy crowd".

     

    • Like 1
  2. Fantastic that you're going ahead with this.

    I'm another one who's dabbled in MSFS and come back to P3Dv5, mainly because of lack of proper multi-screen support and worse (DX11) performance.  I also feel the aircraft handle better.  And it will be quite a while before the SDK allows the development of study-level aircraft.

    In the long run one thing some people forget is that this isn't a FS9 vs FSX situation - the two products are from different and competing companies, Lockheed Martin needs P3D for a lot of value-added products, and so as the limitations of MSFS are sorted out so will further development occur in P3D.

    • Like 3
    • Upvote 1
×
×
  • Create New...