shermank Posted December 5, 2021 Share Posted December 5, 2021 I have read discussions in other forums about using vector. Heretofore, as I understand the advice from Orbx it was not needed. Now, I am wondering what the official recommendation is from Orbx. Thanks. sherm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick Cooper Posted December 5, 2021 Share Posted December 5, 2021 Hello Sherman, Lockheed Martin vastly improved the vector data in P3D v5. However, there were some areas that were satill less than perfect, so Orbx a version for P3D v5. If you already own vector, this is free of charge. It will only be "needed" if one flies in one of the areas that are less then perfect. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clive6354 Posted December 12, 2021 Share Posted December 12, 2021 Which are the areas that are less thsn perfect?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shermank Posted December 12, 2021 Author Share Posted December 12, 2021 On 12/5/2021 at 10:54 AM, Nick Cooper said: Hello Sherman, Lockheed Martin vastly improved the vector data in P3D v5. However, there were some areas that were satill less than perfect, so Orbx a version for P3D v5. If you already own vector, this is free of charge. It will only be "needed" if one flies in one of the areas that are less then perfect. Hi Nick, when I added my Orbx files to v5.3, I included Vector...not sure what it is doing, but it does not seem to detract or cause any problems that I have seen. Sherm 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts