Jump to content

A new PC, totally devoted to FSX_II - Part (2) Processor(s)


GL_FSX

Recommended Posts

This is where I am right now with regard to the new processor. At the moment I´m opting for an i7-920 – mainly because of the price-tag, that comes with the faster ones. Again, any comments, pro´s and con´s are highly appreciated.

Processor: Intel Core i7-950 @ 3.06Ghz (boxed)

http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=37150&processor=i7-950&spec-codes=SLBEN

http://geizhals.at/deutschland/a401758.html    @ 450,00€

Intel Core i7-940 @ 2.93Ghz (boxed)

http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=37148&processor=i7-940&spec-codes=SLBCK

http://geizhals.at/deutschland/a366184.html    @ 450.00€

Intel Core i7-920 @ 2.67Ghz (boxed)

http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=37147&processor=i7-920&spec-codes=SLBCH,SLBEJ

http://geizhals.at/deutschland/a366185.html    @ 230,00€

Mai I also ask for your expert comments with regard to following thougts: I´m still puzzled with this personal “skepticism†of mine, that results from the well known fact, that (a) FSX critically depends on actual processor speed and (B) FSX certainly is NOT and will NOT be a multiprocessor game.

Notwithstanding the advantages of finally getting rid of the “FSB bluesâ€, memory management issues in the new Core i7 processors, I´m still asking myself the same question again and again: what kind of an advantage will it bring if to go for an i7-920 with reduced  processor clockspeed. Don´t I pay twice as much for 3 (“useless ?â€) processor cores still running slower than an E8600 Core2 ?

I probably forgot to mention, that (a) overclocking is not my thing (not experienced), and I also won´t go up in screen resolution as I´m using a beamer (SXGA; 1280 X 1024) for my visuals. In the final stage I plan to use 2-3 of them coupled to a Matrox Triple Head graphics expansion module.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mai I also ask for your expert comments with regard to following thougts: I´m still puzzled with this personal “skepticism†of mine, that results from the well known fact, that (a) FSX critically depends on actual processor speed and (B) FSX certainly is NOT and will NOT be a multiprocessor game.

Notwithstanding the advantages of finally getting rid of the “FSB bluesâ€, memory management issues in the new Core i7 processors, I´m still asking myself the same question again and again: what kind of an advantage will it bring if to go for an i7-920 with reduced  processor clockspeed. Don´t I pay twice as much for 3 (“useless ?â€) processor cores still running slower than an E8600 Core2 ?

I am curious to this answer also, if fsx would run equal or better than an overclocked i7, on an overclocked cheaper 'smaller' cpu id like to know

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The answer has been consisten for a while now:

1) the i7 platform offers significant bandwidth advantages

2) standard clock speeds will not be enough to shine

Overclocking a 920 seems to be best bang for buck, but if you don;t want to - then get a higher clocked processor.  You will however, pay through the nose for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

THANK YOU ALL FOR SHARING YOUR EXPERIENCE AND YOUR EXPERT ADVICE ON THAT TOPIC !

Seems like the only way to go is to have to learn how to overclock an processor  ;)

I´ll make it  ;D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...