EvidencePlz

Oh liverpool too? OMG day one buy for me. Thank you Orbx

"Continue where you left off" aka aircraft's state persistence <<< Does this work with all default and 3rd party aircraft in MSFS 2020?

All of the issues listed above has now been fixed. Thank you Orbx dev and support team.

Oh nice. Thank you

I want that plane! Also, Northern England Orbx pack for MSFS? Please tell me it will include Liverpool and major landmarks, buildings etc. MSFS official uk world update added only three: Royal Liver Building and the two stadiums. I want more! Thank you Orbx.

Thank you maestro Orbx

I'm not sure what's causing this issue on your system, but I tried the ILS at EGLC countless times in C172 and Carenado's PA44 and they always worked. Now I don't know if the last Asobo patch broke something, but when I tried, the ILSs were definitely working.

Never heard of this airport but I have an important question to ask: Do the horses move at all?

Thank you! Now I can day-dream about role-playing as Missionary Bush Pilot in MSFS. Can't wait!

"Acclaimed developer Frank Schnibben (Cityscape Honolulu, Melbourne Cityscape for AUv2)" I just realized I bought both of these for P3D, the sim of the dark age, and they were superb. I'm willing to support the developer again but a question to those at Orbx who make decisions: do you have plans to do something like this but for the whole of Liverpool, England, UK, the airport EGGP and its immediate surrounding area?

This is incredible on a whole new level. I don't live in or have never been to Australia but this is a must-have for me.

Looking beautiful. Can't wait to get it. Why did Orbx not do Fresca though? It's the birthplace for the Microsoft Flight Simulator franchise. The current one in the MSFS marketplace is great but I'd have preferred to have it developed by my most favorite scenery/airport developer Orbx

Found more issues:

Also not sure what a fire rescue truck from Palm Beach Country, Florida, US is doing at EGLC, London, UK

So I just bought it and can confirm I too have this same issue. Screenshot:

Agreed. I can't buy this airport in this state: But I really want to, as the flight from EGGP to EGLC is amazing, specially the approach to it (rwy 27 ILS) where it pretty much gives you a scenic VFR approach over the beautiful and ultra-realistic Orbx london city landmarks, and adding Orbx EGLC will increase and multiply the immersion manifold. I added Orbx EGLC to MSFS marketplace wishlist, and will buy as soon as I see user/customer reports about this and any other current issues getting fixed. Props to Orbx though for already and supposedly fixing some past issues already.

Re: all the criticisms against MSFS London Landmarks in this thread I've bought and used it and I'm not understanding the issue here. We aren't supposed to look at the landmarks from such a low height and distance. This is a flight simulator, not Cities: Skylines. Some of you guys are flying the drone camera literally inches from the landmarks and taking pics. The altitude and distance you are using aren't realistic. You will never fly an aircraft or helicopter that close to the landmarks in London in real life. And think of the FPS hit as well if you really want them highly detailed. Orbx have done a phenomenal job with this addon.

please do KPWT, EGGP and Liverpool for MSFS

These sliders should have happened earlier. Either way my wallet now hates you even more than it ever did.

Looks fantastic. Am I correct in assuming that it will be available for purchase through the in-sim MSFS marketplace as well?

I wanna know this as well. What is the difference between this Orbx LOWI for MSFS and the free but handcrafted version of LOWI in base MSFS?

Congratulations. Microsoft and Asobo have chosen the right partner for this job. 29th September 2019 was the last time I bought an Orbx product for any existing simulator. Haven't bought anything since then, and have uninstalled everything except DCS. Screenshots are looking great. Looks like Orbx will be getting some of my money again on/after the 18th for sure. Printing out my bankruptcy application as we speak [j/k]. What I am really unhappy about is how you guys made it mandatory to buy through ORBXDirect to get the discount for those who own X, Y or Z product already for previous sims (e.g. p3d and xp). I want to keep all my MSFS addons in one place this time (and not deal with the scattered mess that is the P3D/XP addon marketplace) and I'll be choosing the MSFS marketplace this time. This mandatory requirement means I'll have to deal with the standalone Orbx client. Another option is to pay full price. And the last option (which I really don't wanna choose) is not to buy the said Orbx addon at all. Can't you folks come up with some other method to do the verification for existing product owners? It must be possible. It's the year 2020 after all. Think about it! Best wishes. P.S. can you make EGGP for MSFS before Digital Design does it? It's my local, home airport and flight school :-)

Thank you so much for the mention, Ben. I'll compile a list of all the issues and make a separate support post in a few hours. That way I believe it will be easier for the devs to keep track of it. I should have done so earlier. Sorry about that

sorry to hear that @Alan Metcalf Hope you are happy with FTX Central 3. ORBX Central 4 has way too many issues and for after working 48 hours a week I personally don't have the mindset and physical energy to deal with them. After doing a full installation and going back to FTX 3 now it takes 40 seconds for the start up scenario screen to appear and then it takes less than a minute to jump into the cockpit. It's never been this fast before. If this means I can no longer buy new ORBX products then so be it. But I just can't technically afford to spend days troubleshooting one issue after another. I've reinstalled all ORBX addons now and after configuring FTX 3 I'm now done with it too. I will never launch it again in case it does something to force me to install ORBX Central 4. Happy simming!

Good question. I don't know the answer, but apparently lots of people (I'm not one of them) were asking for such a feature