Jump to content

asjiopd

Members
  • Posts

    9
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by asjiopd

  1. Just bought the Triple Pack and it's worth every cent as always! Great overall quality, great flair on the airport and always great ATC coverage on VATSIM with controllers scheduling their sessions in advance! @Marcus Nyberg if I may give feedback on just a few minor runway marking deviations from the real world: ESNQ touchdown zone markings at RWY21 should be beginning from the threshold: "3 Bars, Aiming Point, 2 Bars, 2 Bars, 1 Bar, 1 Bar". If you could add one "2 Bar" marking, then it would be 100% accurate (RWY03 is correct!) ESKS RWY15 touchdown zone markings should be: "3 Bars, 3 Bars, Aiming Point, 2 Bars, 1 Bar, 1 Bar". Adding one "3 Bar" marking prior the aiming point and removing one "2 Bar" marker beyond it, would make it perfectly accurate again 😉 (RWY 33 is fully correct) ESNU: Markings on RWY14 seem to be a bit off to the left (or the centerline a bit off to the right? For your upcoming projects: Make whatever airport that features a runway just as long as the one in Skiathos to accommodate a 737 and a 757 and I'll buy it anyway, regardless where in Europe it is 😄
  2. Thank you very very much @Marcus Nyberg I really like the way you put love into detail of your airports and I'm happy I can fly to Göteborg again 👍👍👍
  3. Thank you very much for your answer @Nick Cooper, happy that we share the same thoughts about the urgent need of the ability to switch them on or off. I don't need a fancy centralised app for this, just put all the static aircraft models in one bgl that has got "static aircraft" in it and I'll rename it on my own 👍 Contrail's scenery app provides this feature for quite some time now and I'm glad that Orbx control panels are now being provided to allow the switching wherever it's possible. I mean, it's a pity for a developer to put couple hundred working hours into a single project while Orbx and the dev is loosing hundreds or thousands of EUR/USD/AUD/whatever of turnover just because people who fly online can't use this scenery as they're used to from other airports. Last year's Navigraph Flight Sim Survey had 25427 participants and 16400 of them have been flying online in the last 12 months. That's 16400 people who've potentially saw other pilots sitting on top of a static aircraft, have been assigned to a gate already occupied by a static model, etc. I think it's very important to raise awareness to devs that the one hour spent on adding an option to disable static aircraft brings you probably the best hourly rate of profit compared to the whole time spent on doing an airport. Take care!
  4. Hey there, just wanted to make a request to the devs: pleeeease... a) add an option to disable static aircraft or b) allow us to manually remove them by the old fashioned way of renaming a "static_aircraft.bgl" to .bak or something else. MSFS is finally at a stage where I start to invest money on payware addons (snow coverage bug fixed) but I can't buy airports I know I'll gonna have troubles when flying online. Yeah I know I can ask for a different gate on arrival etc but it just looks like sht when there's another pilot sitting on top of a static aircraft model. I think addons like LIEO Olbia, LGSK Skiathos, LOWI Innsbruck and EGGD Bristol look outstanding and the devs did a very good job on them but they're ruined by static aircraft. This is the only reason why I can't buy them. Would love to spend a couple hundred EUR more but I can't do so until this bug gets fixed 😉 B€$t regards 😊
  5. Is it really that bad? Do you own it for MSFS? From what I can tell by the screenshots, UK2000s Luton does not look too bad at all and worth about 15€ or so. Opinions welcome via private message to keep this thread on topic.
  6. @pyreegueAlthough I don't own any payware airports for MSFS yet (bugs like the 285°C temp bug or disappearing RWY and TWY lights when arriving at night make it absolutely unflyable atm) I'm always super excited when there's news from you! I've never bought any UK2000 airports for P3D back then, because there was still a bit of room for improvement imho, so I'm very happy for any UK airport you want to recreate in MSFS and I guess a lot of those who already own a UK2000 airport are willing to upgrade to your version too! Regarding EGLL Heathrow: I personally prefer two mid size airports in the time you'd need to make one Heathrow addon. If you need a challenge, go for EGLL, you are among the few devs who can create a very accurate Heathrow version but again: I think your talent is better spent on airports like you've done in the past. Picking up suggestions from @BAW9DV and @carlosqr: LKPR Praha, VRMM Male, LHBP Budapest (LH Sim version is quite good, so, not a good choice), LYBE Belgrade, LROP Bucarest and LBSF Sofia would be really nice and I'd buy them right away (if MSFS was finally free of major bugs that make your aircraft stuck in the air like it was jelly). In addition to those good recommendations, I'd LOVE to have a top notch rendition of EFHK Helsinki and the three baltic capitals EETN Tallin, EVRA Riga, EYVI Vilnius. Heading further south and east: HAAB Addis Ababa, LLBG Tel Aviv, UGTB Tiblisi, UDYZ Yerevan, airports in central asian states (if you really want to go off the beaten track) like Türkmenistan, Uzbekistan or Kirgiztan and finally airports in Iran. Most of those airports are perfectly in range for an A320 or A310-300 from Europe, Dubai, India and China. Anything you'll touch next will be on my shortlist but the only thing that's a no-go for me: If any given airport has got a RWY shorter than 1800-1900m, 'cause I need some TODA to get from your next airport back to Europe or Dubai within a couple hours without clipping the approach lights on the end of the RWY. Cheers!
×
×
  • Create New...