Jump to content

AnkH

Members
  • Posts

    947
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by AnkH

  1. Well, to be honest: probably 90% of the customers of such small airfields ARE very much aware of this fact, because only those knowing this airfield will buy it. Even a RJ100 from Swiss would be wrong, as they never served LSZB anyway. 

     

    I prefer rather no statics over such inaccuracies. Or at least, if you are aware of it, make it optional.

     

    Bummer, but with this static ATR non removable, I am not going to spend money on this product.

  2. 1 hour ago, jaydor said:

    The Official Folder/Onestore...

    Ehm, you are aware that the ordering inside this folder is only a visual aspect and you can change this also from Z to A instead of A to Z and then your Orbx folders are not on TOP but on the very bottom?

     

    What you mean is the ordering within the content.xml file and this is (usually) alphabetic. But it can get messed up, that is why I delete the content.xml file from time to time and let it rebuild... this usually fixes such errors even without taking any care about the ordering of the addons...

    • Thanks 1
  3. 13 hours ago, Adam Banks said:

    Does anyone know if scenery *order* (in the contents.xml file) is important for Orbx-related scenery?

    I always delete the content.xml file after a MSFS update, often even after bigger scenery addon updates. You can basically delete the .xml every time you fire up MSFS, never had any issue with it and it does also not slow down loading or such

     

    BTW: I sadly stopped using NZMF completely, but due to another reason that is still not fixed two years after release: the ridiculous snow coverage when using live weather. How do you guys fly in the sim? For me, if I am using live weather, I always have snow coverage around NZMF. If not directly at Milford itself, for sure some miles north. Totally immersion breaking...

  4. Really disappointed by the Orbx London City Landmarks, this is a joke. I dont even buy the explanation "from higher altitude it looks ok, it was not meant for low level flying" as this is simply an blunt excuse for having it messed up. There was NO, absolutely NO need to replace the POIs that MSFS already offers in great detail in the default city, I really do not get why somebody decided to do this. The only explanation that makes sense: pure lazyness. Taking those POIs out would have increased the workload so it was skipped. Simple as that and a really bad sign that Orbx goes down this route...

    • Upvote 3
×
×
  • Create New...